Three SKUs, and the gap between them is not gradual. Basic cannot block a known malicious address, only tell you about it.
Azure Firewall Basic supports threat intelligence in alert mode only. Standard adds alert and deny, network level FQDN filtering, web categories and DNS proxy. Premium adds TLS inspection, a managed intrusion detection and prevention system with over 67,000 signatures, and URL filtering on the full path. Choosing between them is the whole design decision.

- 250 Mbps to 100 GbpsThe throughput range across the three SKUs
- Alert onlyWhat Basic threat intelligence can do
- 67,000 signaturesPremium IDPS, in over 50 categories
- All three SKUsBuilt-in high availability and availability zones
Eight things that determine which SKU you actually need.
Threat intelligence, and the Basic caveat that matters
Threat intelligence based filtering alerts on traffic to and from known malicious IP addresses and domains sourced from the Microsoft threat intelligence feed. In Standard and Premium it can alert and deny. In Basic, Microsoft states plainly that the feature only provides alerts and cannot deny traffic. An organisation that chose Basic on price is running a firewall that watches known-bad destinations rather than blocking them.
FQDN filtering, in two very different forms
All three SKUs support application level FQDN filtering, based on server name indication, for HTTPS and SQL traffic without TLS termination. Only Standard and Premium support network level FQDN filtering across all ports and protocols using DNS resolution, which is what lets you filter outbound NTP, SSH, RDP and anything else by name rather than by address.
TLS inspection is Premium only, and it is the big one
Premium decrypts outbound traffic, processes it, then re-encrypts and forwards it, creating two TLS connections, one with the web server and one with the client. That covers outbound inspection of traffic from Azure to the internet and east-west inspection of traffic within Azure including to and from on-premises. Without it, most of what is happening inside HTTPS is invisible.
A managed IDPS, with signatures you can tune
Premium provides signature-based intrusion detection and prevention with over 67,000 rules in more than 50 categories, 20 to 40 or more new rules released daily, and support for customising up to 10,000 IDPS rules. Individual signatures can be set to disabled, alert, or alert and deny, and private IP ranges are configured so the system can tell inbound from outbound from east-west traffic.
Web categories, and why Premium categorises differently
Standard and Premium both allow or deny access by web category. The difference is what gets examined. Microsoft published example is instructive: for an HTTPS request to www.google.com/news, Standard examines only the FQDN and categorises it as a search engine, while Premium examines the complete URL and categorises it as news. Full path URL filtering is Premium only and depends on TLS inspection.
Throughput, which is a hard ceiling on Basic
Basic is a fixed scale unit with two virtual machine backend instances, recommended for an estimated throughput of 250 Mbps. Standard autoscales up to 30 Gbps with 1 Gbps fat flow support. Premium reaches 100 Gbps with 10 Gbps fat flow support. Because Basic is a fixed scale unit rather than autoscaling, growth is a migration rather than a setting.
DNS proxy, and the reason it exists
Standard and Premium can act as a DNS proxy, processing and forwarding DNS queries from virtual networks to your chosen server, and can use custom DNS while resolving the firewall own outbound dependencies through Azure DNS. Microsoft states this functionality is crucial for reliable FQDN filtering in network rules, which makes it a dependency rather than a convenience.
Everything shares the same operational floor
All three SKUs include built-in high availability with no extra load balancers to configure, availability zone deployment at no extra cost, source and destination network address translation, full Azure Monitor logging with SIEM integration, central management through Firewall Manager, policy analytics, and automation through REST, PowerShell, CLI, templates and Terraform.
Basic is not a smaller Standard. It is missing the thing that blocks.
The three SKUs are not a linear price and performance ladder. Specific security capabilities are simply absent from Basic, and one of them is the reason people deploy a firewall.
- Threat intelligence based filtering in Basic supports alert mode only. Microsoft states it cannot deny traffic. In Standard and Premium the same feature alerts and denies traffic to and from known malicious IP addresses and domains.
- Basic also has no network level FQDN filtering across all ports and protocols, no web categories, no DNS proxy and no forced tunnelling, and it is a fixed scale unit with two backend instances rather than an autoscaling service.
- Microsoft positions Basic for small and medium businesses at an estimated throughput of 250 Mbps, which is a legitimate use case. It stops being legitimate the moment somebody assumes it is doing what Standard does.
- The failure mode we see is a Basic deployment chosen during a cost exercise, with a security architecture document written against Standard capabilities. Nobody notices until an incident review asks why traffic to a known malicious domain was allowed.
Four things that make an Azure Firewall deployment worth what it costs.
We size the SKU against the requirement, not the budget line
If the security design says block traffic to known malicious destinations, Basic cannot deliver it and no amount of configuration will change that. If it says inspect inside HTTPS, only Premium can. Writing the capability requirement first and choosing the SKU second avoids the deployment that satisfies a procurement decision and not the architecture.
We get DNS right before relying on FQDN rules
Network level FQDN filtering resolves names to addresses, so it is only as reliable as the resolution behind it. Microsoft states DNS proxy functionality is crucial for reliable FQDN filtering in network rules, and that is a dependency to design deliberately rather than discover when a rule intermittently fails for reasons nobody can reproduce.
We tune IDPS rather than switching it on and walking away
Premium ships over 67,000 signatures across more than 50 categories with 20 to 40 or more added daily, supports customising up to 10,000 rules, and lets each signature be set to disabled, alert, or alert and deny. Configuring private IP ranges so the system can distinguish inbound, outbound and east-west traffic is what makes that tuning meaningful.
We use policy analytics to prune, not just to add
Rule bases only ever grow, because adding a rule solves today problem and removing one risks breaking something nobody remembers. Policy analytics shows rule usage over time, which turns pruning from a guess into an evidence-based exercise. That is the single most useful recurring activity on a firewall estate.
Six UAE situations where the Azure-native firewall is the right choice.
A hub and spoke landing zone across several subscriptions
Firewall Manager provides a central place to manage Azure Firewalls across multiple subscriptions, applying a common set of network and application rules through firewall policies, and supports both virtual network and Virtual WAN secure hub environments. For a landing zone with per-workload subscriptions, that is the difference between one policy set and a dozen drifting ones.
A regulated firm that needs to inspect encrypted outbound traffic
Premium TLS inspection terminates and inspects TLS connections to detect, alert and mitigate malicious activity inside HTTPS, creating two connections, one with the server and one with the client. Where an obligation requires visibility of what leaves the environment, that capability is not optional and it is Premium only.
A business that needs URL rather than domain control
The published example makes the difference concrete. For an HTTPS request to a news path on a search engine domain, Standard sees only the domain and categorises it as a search engine, while Premium examines the full URL and categorises it as news. Where policy is written at path level rather than domain level, that gap decides the SKU.
An operator routing cloud traffic back through on-premises
Forced tunnelling, available on Standard and Premium, routes all internet-bound traffic to a designated next hop instead of directly to the internet, so an existing on-premises edge firewall or network virtual appliance can process it first. Deployment without a public IP address in forced tunnel mode is supported on the same SKUs.
An organisation replacing a self-managed virtual appliance
A firewall appliance running as a virtual machine in Azure carries patching, sizing, licensing and availability design that somebody has to own. Azure Firewall has built-in high availability with no extra load balancers required, availability zone support at no extra cost, and autoscaling on Standard and Premium, which removes most of that operational surface.
A small environment where Basic genuinely is the right answer
Microsoft positions Basic for small and medium businesses, at an estimated throughput of 250 Mbps, with a fixed scale unit of two backend instances. That is a legitimate choice for a small footprint, provided the security design is written against what Basic actually does rather than what Standard does, and provided the growth path is understood as a migration.
How UAE organisations secure Azure network traffic.
| Feature | Azure Firewall, right SKU | Network security groups only | A virtual appliance nobody manages |
|---|---|---|---|
Stateful layer three and four filtering | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Filtering by fully qualified domain name | Yes | No | Varies |
Known malicious destinations blocked | Yes, Standard and above | No | Varies |
Web category control | Yes, Standard and above | No | Varies |
Inspection inside TLS | Yes, Premium | No | Varies |
Intrusion detection and prevention | Yes, Premium | No | Varies |
High availability without extra design | Yes | Not applicable | No |
Scales with traffic automatically | Yes, Standard and above | Not applicable | No |
Central policy across subscriptions | Yes | No | No |
Patching and lifecycle burden | None | None | Yours |
Sixteen capabilities across Basic, Standard and Premium.
| Capability | Basic | Standard | Premium | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stateful firewall with five-tuple rules | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Source and destination network address translation | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Built-in high availability | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Availability zones | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Application level FQDN filtering, SNI based | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Network level FQDN filtering, all ports and protocols | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Web content filtering by web categories | No | Yes | Yes | |
| URL filtering on the full path, with SSL termination | No | No | Yes | |
| Outbound TLS termination, forward proxy | No | No | Yes | |
| Threat intelligence based filtering | Alert only | Alert and deny | Alert and deny | |
| Fully managed intrusion detection and prevention | No | No | Yes | |
| DNS proxy and custom DNS | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Cloud scalability | Up to 250 Mbps | Up to 30 Gbps | Up to 100 Gbps | |
| Fat flow support | Not applicable | 1 Gbps | 10 Gbps | |
| Multiple public IP addresses | Supported | Up to 250 | Up to 250 | |
| Forced tunnelling | No | Yes | Yes |
Five steps, and the rule base is the part that outlives the project.
- 1
Establish the capability requirement, then the SKU
Whether known malicious destinations must be blocked rather than merely alerted on, whether traffic inside TLS must be inspected, whether intrusion detection and prevention is required, whether policy is written at URL or domain level, and what throughput is realistic. The SKU falls out of those answers rather than driving them.
- 2
Design the topology and the routing
Hub and spoke or Virtual WAN secure hub, availability zone placement, public IP requirements, and whether forced tunnelling is needed to send internet-bound traffic through an existing on-premises edge. East-west inspection only happens for traffic that is actually routed through the firewall, so routing design is security design here.
- 3
Build the policy with tags rather than addresses
Service tags representing groups of address prefixes that Microsoft maintains and updates automatically, and FQDN tags for well-known Azure service traffic such as Windows Update. Both dramatically reduce the number of rules a human has to maintain, and both keep working when Microsoft address ranges change.
- 4
Tune threat protection to the environment
On Premium, private IP ranges configured so the IDPS can distinguish inbound, outbound and east-west traffic, then signature tuning by category with individual rules set to disabled, alert, or alert and deny. On Standard, threat intelligence moved from alert to deny once the traffic has been observed and the false positive risk understood.
- 5
Wire logging and establish a pruning rhythm
Full logging into Azure Monitor with SIEM integration, the Azure Firewall workbook for analysis, and a scheduled review using policy analytics to find rules that no longer match anything. Rule bases grow indefinitely without that last step, and an unmaintained rule base eventually stops representing anybody intent.
What organisations ask about Azure Firewall.
Fifteen questions that decide the design.
Sizing the SKU
- What throughput do you actually need?250 Mbps, 30 Gbps or 100 Gbps.
- Do you need to block known malicious destinations?Basic only alerts.
- Do you need TLS inspection?Premium only.
- Do you need signature-based IDPS?Premium only.
- Are you in a payment card environment?PCI DSS compliance is listed for Premium.
Policy design
- Network rules, application rules or both?They behave differently.
- Is DNS proxy needed for FQDN network rules?Microsoft calls it crucial.
- Are service tags and FQDN tags in use?They reduce rule sprawl significantly.
- Is east-west traffic in scope?The firewall inspects it, if routed there.
- Do you need forced tunnelling?Standard and Premium only.
Operations
- Where do the logs go?Azure Monitor, with SIEM integration.
- Is Firewall Manager used across subscriptions?One policy set, many firewalls.
- Has anyone run policy analytics?It shows rule usage over time.
- Who reviews and removes stale rules?Rule bases grow, nobody prunes.
- Which IDPS signatures are tuned?Up to 10,000 can be customised.
The pages around this one.
Check whether your firewall can block a known malicious address, or only tell you about it.
That is a SKU fact rather than a configuration one, and it is a question most organisations have never asked. It takes a minute to answer and it occasionally changes the whole security architecture conversation.
Related Services
Explore more solutions that work great with this service
Azure Security Audit
Subscription audit, starting with the free tier you already own
Defender for Cloud
Azure posture, and the free tier almost nobody has enabled
Network Monitoring NOC
24/7 NOC monitoring with named engineers
Azure Cloud Solutions
Azure landing zone, migration, FinOps, managed
Azure Key Vault
Secrets, keys and certificates out of config files
Fortinet FortiGate Dubai
Sizing, deployment and managed firewall lifecycle
Microsoft Security Dubai
Entra, Defender, Purview, Sentinel, and what you already own
Entra Global Secure Access
Internet Access, Private Access and tenant restrictions